Voices for propose us various solutions to avoid a new April 21

Voices for propose us various solutions to avoid a new April 21. Or give in the discipline of party (prohibition for mayors to sponsor one candidate other than that designated by the PS) or modification of voting modes (establishment of an intermediary round eliminating candidates who have not reached a certain threshold of votes) appears to be the last of solutions precisely to avoid l'histoire repeats. It seems legitimate that the game democratic work trusting the judgment of the people on the policy conducted and future. Remedied by the authoritarianism of party or electoral do-it-yourself to denials of policy of successive Governments for more than twenty years, to the point of making the sterile left-right alternation, looks to what design strategists at Bay. The French people since 1981, has always spurned outgoing majorities. The same people, on April 21, 2002, 5 May 2002 and may 29, 2005, is also clearly expressed. No decisive inflection has been made on the policies pursued at the highest level of the State.

Policy issues for the 2007 presidential election are yet clear and the last time schemes use will bring no significant improvement of democratic expression. Authoritarian politics as the rule of law, and especially that of modes of election, have indeed never prevented a political current to work. Then, Yes, gentlemen journalists and constitutional, Jean-Marie Le Pen will be well in the second round of the presidential election if the political class in power since 30 years aims to curb democracy, taking once more the people for a wrong-including. The risk of dispersal of the voters in the first round is due to substantive political problems, not a problem of democratic safeguard. That's what your instructions of sponsorships and reform of the election, presented as a single, silent.

Courage is now in the about-face policy choice and not the legal barricades. The men of the major parties of left and right were well aware that they leave a very broad field policy to the extremist parties. This field is essentially proposing sharp solutions to the problem of employment, deindustrialization, the over-indebtedness of the State, education, immigration, and our place in a Europe adrift.

Should we give up our health insurance, unemployment insurance and pension systems to remain in the global competition If we do not want to abandon, what should be done Of economic patriotism Return to a minimum of protectionism Reforming our taxation Should sommer Europe react and require limitations to economic free trade Or, on the contrary, admit that we are a people of another time and need to review our substantive ideas in fills in global competition These issues, once again, are clear. Ask us how we can let the world market economy have the right to reform our social contract.

Therefore, solutions are not in the reforms that support to democratic representation. Political courage is surely now in charge of programs that benefit from the presumption of unpopularity. Simply because the people, it is not a technician of the law or of the economy, have still enough intuition to forge a judgment. Thus, economically drastic solutions shall be accepted if they are clearly exposed by convinced Democrats, and not by hypocrites of the politically correct of the so-called democratically acceptable or other extremists.

For the time being, do not forget that the France lived in the disappointment. She sees today in survey (in dream) a candidate in the second round assume nothing of what might happen in the first. If the presidential campaigns of both major parties leave the French disappointed and frustrated, the challenge will be terrifying.